<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Beta &#8211; Vs &#8211; Vista 32Bit Sp1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/.</link>
	<description>Everything about Windows 7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:16:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/./comment-page-1#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Wabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/.#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Running Windows 7 beta now on another machine and it is about the same as VISTA for what I do.  Don&#039;t notice increase in speed but I just do office work and kill time on Yahoo Answers, and cruise the internet.

I had no trouble when I gor VISTA from XP and no troubles with W7 so far, bu tit is a beta and subject to crashes and such.  Final product will be better, I presume, as most are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running Windows 7 beta now on another machine and it is about the same as VISTA for what I do.  Don&#8217;t notice increase in speed but I just do office work and kill time on Yahoo Answers, and cruise the internet.</p>
<p>I had no trouble when I gor VISTA from XP and no troubles with W7 so far, bu tit is a beta and subject to crashes and such.  Final product will be better, I presume, as most are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbrminsanity</title>
		<link>http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/./comment-page-1#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>tbrminsanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/.#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 Beta is faster then Vista 32-bit SP1 (as proven by numerous independent groups).  If you run a 32-bit system though and can&#039;t use 64-bit then I would not switch to Win 7 B as it is 64-bit only (though it can run 32-bit apps).  Plus &quot;Win 7 B will become useless after Aug (just before Win 7 goes on sale).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 Beta is faster then Vista 32-bit SP1 (as proven by numerous independent groups).  If you run a 32-bit system though and can&#8217;t use 64-bit then I would not switch to Win 7 B as it is 64-bit only (though it can run 32-bit apps).  Plus &#8220;Win 7 B will become useless after Aug (just before Win 7 goes on sale).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/./comment-page-1#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7resource.com/software/windows-7-beta-vs-vista-32bit-sp1/.#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>windows 7 is better than Vista... And I hate windows products...

Ubuntu is better than both</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>windows 7 is better than Vista&#8230; And I hate windows products&#8230;</p>
<p>Ubuntu is better than both</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
